As I was reading* Towards Zero recently, I became interested in the way Dame Agatha Christie so elegantly and effortlessly casts suspicion on (almost) every single character.
What I noticed was that she not only takes turns with characters, but she also varies the “modality” through which the reader is informed, creating a rich and relentless narrative unfolding.
For example, sometimes the suspicion may be created by the way one character feels about another, then their impression of a glance, then a memory, or a fuzzy mental association.
These are often further layered through conversations in which characters react to each other and arouse the reader’s suspicion of both parties.
I don’t think a single page goes by without some deft detail being added to compound the suspicion regarding one character or another.
* Actually, I was listening to Hugh Fraser’s brilliant reading.
Casting Suspicion
I thought it would be helpful to list all the “attributes of suspicion” and narrative “modalities” that I noted down while reading.
Assuming you already have a mystery and the requisite clues and red herrings, you can combine these two lists to cast doubt on even the most blameless character.
ATTRIBUTE:
- Something kept hidden / under control
- Suggestion / admission of ability, means, or motive
- Suggestion or admission of dislike
- A look of [FEELING] (e.g. hate, strain, guilt, etc.)
- Other body language “clues” (e.g. blushing, trembling, dropping something, hesitating, starting, etc.)
- The ability to act / dissemble / charm
- Appearance / aura (e.g. clever, simple, cunning, quiet, unassuming, etc.)
- The ability to plan / premeditate / experiment / work things out
- A conducive personality (e.g. likely to hold grudges, suspicious, meek, dislikes losing, perfectionist, etc.)
- Physical idiosyncrasy (that might make a person easier to remember or be recognised)
- Interpretation of another’s words or actions
- Access to the victim, the weapon, the crime scene, etc.
- Drawing attention away
- Knowledge of the murder methods
- Suggestion / admission of lying, unreliability or mental instability
MODALITY:
- Conversation
- Feeling / intuition
- Showing / demonstrating
- (Over)heard
- Seen / observed
- Smelled
- Touched
- Tasted
- Memory / story
- Writing
- Mental association
- Thoughts
☞ I recommend downloading the handout in the Coterie for a tidier representation of these lists.
Examples
Here are some examples, from Towards Zero, of Dame Agatha Christie’s methods for casting suspicion on characters. Of course, there’s a lot more subtlety at work than this template suggests, but hopefully it’s a helpful start for relating your own mystery.
Conversation + Feeling + Something hidden + Ability to work things out:
… ‘In a way, Audrey gives me the creeps. I don’t know what it is about her. You never know what she’s thinking… She’s – she’s a little frightening.’
‘Oh, nonsense, Kay.’
‘Well, she frightens me. Perhaps it’s because she’s got brains.’
(p. 41)
Thought + Observation + Feeling + Interpretation:
‘It was as though she were holding herself tightly in leash, watchful over every movement – and yet all the time intensely aware of everything going on round her. She was like a person, he thought, who had a secret to hide. But what secret?’
(p. 84)
Conversation + Observation + Memory + Idiosyncrasy + Appearance:
‘Rather an interesting shaped head – a curious angle from the crown to the neck – rendered less noticeable by the way he has his hair cut, but distinctly unusual.’
After another pause, he went on still more dreamily:
‘The last man I saw with a head like that got ten years’ penal servitude for a brutal assault on an elderly jeweller.’
‘Surely, exclaimed Mary, ‘you don’t mean -?’
‘Not at all, not at all,’ said Mr Treves. ‘You mistake me entirely. I am suggesting no disparagement of a guest of yours. I was merely pointing out that a hardened and brutal criminal can be in appearance a most charming and personable young man. Odd, but so it is.’
He smiled gently at her. Mary said: ‘You know, Mr Treves, I think I am a little frightened of you.’
‘Nonsense, dear lady.’
‘But I am. You are – such a very shrewd observer.’
(pp. 106-7)
Conversation + Ability to plan + Interpretation:
‘Oh, I plan things,’ said Mary vaguely. ‘In my mind, you know. And I like experimenting sometimes – upon people. Just seeing, you know, if I can make them react to what I say in the way I mean.’
‘You sound almost sadistic, Mary. How little I really know you!’
(p. 135)
Conversation + Observation + Appearance + Interpretation:
… ‘I’m not really heartless, but now that Nevile’s all right I can’t help being pleased he had a bit of a shaking up. He’s always so damned complacent.’
‘He isn’t really, Thomas.’
‘Perhaps not. It’s just his manner. Anyway he was looking scared as Hell this morning!’
‘What a cruel streak you have!’
(p. 237)
Conversation + Body Language:
‘It’s about Mr Treves.’
Thomas dropped his pipe on the stones. His voice changed as he bent to pick it up.
‘What about Mr Treves?’
(p. 238)
Further Resources
- Solving a Mystery Worksheet – work backwards from clues that interest you to develop a mystery.
- Tension Brewing Worksheet – scene ideas to increase suspense.
- 30 Scene Ideas for Mystery Subplots – scene ideas for mystery.
